Legal Opinion

Irma Hosiery Co. v. Schulman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal in a .cancellation proceeding pursuant to the provisions of the Trade-Mark Act of February 20, 1905, now 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, 90 USPQ 40, affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining a petition by appellee to cancel the registration of appellant’s trade-mark “Scheherazade.”

It appears that appellant’s trade-mark was duly registered in the United States Patent Office on August 31, 1948, Registration No. 440,410, as applied to women’s hosiery.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crown Overall Mfg. Co. v. Desmond'sCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Lever Bros. v. HormelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. Turco Products, Inc. v. Tykor Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Continental Coffee Co., Inc. v. Continental Foods, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Continental Coffee Co., Inc. v. Continental Foods, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Eureka Williams Corp. v. McCorquodaleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. Eureka Williams Corp. v. McCorquodaleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Irma Hosiery Co. v. SchulmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API