Legal Opinion

Heath v. Sandersville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1919No. 9781, 9782PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Sandersville—Judge Jordan. April 33, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. In an action against a common carrier for failure to safely transport and deliver live stock committed to it in good order by a shipper, particular acts of negligence need not be alleged, and when alleged may be treated as surplusage. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Warfield, 129 Ga. 473 (59 S. E. 234) ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. McHan, 144 Ga. 683 (87 S. E. 889) ; Southern Express Co. v. Bailey, 7 *256Ga. App. 331 (66 S. E. 960); Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Stamps, 17 Ga. App. 453 (87 S. E. 702).

2. “When a carrier .fails to deliver the goods intrusted to his care, or delivers them…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Warfield & LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Augusta Railway Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Hill v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Railway Express Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Hogg v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Shippey & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Director-General of Railroads v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API