Hogg v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
“Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for new trial must be complete within itself; and when so incomplete as to require a reference to the brief of the evidence, or to some other portion of the record, in order to determine what was the alleged error and whether such error was material, the ground will not be considered by the reviewing court.” Tice Co. v. Evans, 32 Ga. App. 385 (16) (123 S. E. 742); Bank of Commerce v. First Nat. Bank of Ocilla, 32 Ga. App. 410 (1) (123 S. E. 736); Pound v. Smith, 146 Ga. 431 (5) (91 S. E. 405);…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. PilcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Pound v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tucker v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Yellow Cab Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Empacadora De Ciudad Juarez, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Sloan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Bugg v. Perry & FairclothCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.