Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 27, 2010No. 307PA09PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

This case presents the question whether defendant is entitled to a new trial based upon admission of evidence to which he did not offer a timely objection at trial and which he did not contend *273amounted to plain error on appeal. We conclude that defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s decision to admit into evidence a portion of his testimony regarding his history of alcohol consumption and assaultive behavior. Further, we determine that even if defendant had preserved this issue for appellate review by timely objection, he would not be entitled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AugustineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. OglesbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. ThibodeauxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. Ortiz-ZapeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. SneadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. FlaugherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API