Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bunker Resource Recycling & Reclamation, Inc. v. Howald

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1989No. 15766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

By its petition in prohibition, the corporate defendant in the underlying action seeks to prevent the plaintiffs from taking the deposition of a witness as the “managing agent” of the defendant. This court issued its preliminary order. Rule 97.04. The following is an outline of the procedural background of the proceeding.

The plaintiffs in the underlying action are four residents of the Bunker, Missouri, area and Simonds Manufacturing Corporation, a Florida Corporation (Simonds). The petition is in three counts. By the first two counts, the individual plaintiffs prayed for an order…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. William H. Webster, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Kingsley v. BurackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Jordan v. Robert Half Personnel Agencies of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Strohfeld v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darrian Dewayne Johnson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  2. Darrian Dewayne Johnson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  3. Toyota Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API