Toyota Motor Corp. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
KLEIN, P. J., Concurring.
I concur in the lead opinion and its holding that irrespective of Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.260,1 which authorizes a court to permit the deposition of a party or officer, director, managing agent or employee of a party at a location more distant than that permitted under section 2025.250, the superior court is precluded by section 1989 from ordering a nonresident to appear at a California deposition. But I have concurred in the court’s opinion because I agree the present discovery statutory scheme compels the conclusion reached in that opinion. I write…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sibley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In re Honda American Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Integral Development Corp. v. WeissenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Work v. BierDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc. v. Omron Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.