Flores v. Stone
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Each action is for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage and the two cases involve the same facts except as to the amount of money involved and that in the first cause E. F. Stone is joined as a defendant as executor of the last will and testament of Marie M. Wilson, deceased, but no claim is made against said estate and all right to any personal judgment against said estate is waived.
The cause of action in the two cases grows out of the execution of three notes. The two involved in the first action were executed by defendants E. F. Stone and said Marie M. Wilson, deceased. To secure the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kellogg v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Evans v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Alferitz v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Navajo Live Stock & Trading Co. v. Gallup State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Hull-Dobbs Co. of Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Nett v. Stockgrowers' Finance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.