Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. P. U. C.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1973No. Appeal, No. 398 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This opinion and accompanying order will be dis-positive of cross motions. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) filed a motion to quash the appeal of the Pennsylvania Power & Light Company (PP&L) from an order of the PUC dated March 28, 1971. Thereafter, PP&L filed a motion to dismiss the PUC’s motion to quash. This Court restricted the argument to the “cross motions,” and postponed argu*324ment on the merits pending the determination of the motions.

Following the filing of the PUC order, which is an exhaustive adjudication into the many facets of an electric…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Harrisburg Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Drabant v. CureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Penn Sheraton Hotel v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hodge v. Zoning Hearing Board of West Bradford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. Laurel Pipe Line Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API