First National City Bank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKuNzig, Judge
Plaintiff, First National City Bank, comes before the court seeking a recovery as assignee of certain Government contract rights, ($54,369.37 plus interest) free of defendant’s independent set-off claims. The contract in question contains set-off protection language. Under the facts of the instant action, plaintiff has standing to sue either as beneficiary of a prior assignment of the contract, or as subrogee, and may use the set-off protection provisions. We hold for plaintiff.
I
Foots:
The facts are somewhat involved. The genesis of the present claim is found in a December 28, 1966, contract…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Thomas Funding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Raphan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- PowerUnited States Court of Claims · 1976