Legal Opinion

First National City Bank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1976No. 9-75PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKuNzig, Judge

Plaintiff, First National City Bank, comes before the court seeking a recovery as assignee of certain Government contract rights, ($54,369.37 plus interest) free of defendant’s independent set-off claims. The contract in question contains set-off protection language. Under the facts of the instant action, plaintiff has standing to sue either as beneficiary of a prior assignment of the contract, or as subrogee, and may use the set-off protection provisions. We hold for plaintiff.

I

Foots:

The facts are somewhat involved. The genesis of the present claim is found in a December 28, 1966, contract…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Thomas Funding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Raphan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. First National City Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. PowerUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API