Legal Opinion · Dissent

Power

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 25, 1976No. 439-74Published

1DissentBennett, Judge

with whom Skelton, Judge., joins:

“I .respectively dissent from the action of the majority in refusing an en bane rehearing,, limited, however, to the narrow ground of its refusal to reinstate plaintiff to his position as he requested in paragraphs I and VIII of his petition. The court has hold that plaintiff is entitled to back pay because his discharge was illegal since, in the court’s opinion it was an excessive penalty for his offenses. In declining to reinstate plaintiff, the opinion of the court explains it only by saying ‘we have determined not 'to order reinstatement in this action in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API