Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Vance v. Marikis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1999No. Nos. 96-18 and 96-472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Two issues are presented: (1) Does “some evidence” support TTD termination? and (2) What is the proper date of termination? As to the former, we find that Dr. Purewal’s report is “some evidence.” Claimant attacks the report, asserting that it was invalidated by the later allowance of “thoracic sprain and myofascial pain syndrome.” Dr. Purewal, however, examined claimant’s entire back, including the thoracic region, and commented on the complaints of pain that presumably prompted claimant to seek recognition of thoracic sprain and myofascial pain syndrome. This distinguishes this case from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Richardson v. Quarto Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Industrial Comm., 06ap-610 (4-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Carlson v. Avon Prods., Inc., 08ap-38 (11-20-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Rms of Ohio, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (3-28-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Lloyd v. Indus. Comm., 07ap-79 (9-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Vance v. MarikisOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API