Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Richardson v. Quarto Mining Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1995No. 94-397PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

One question is presented: Is Dr. Shahabi’s report “some evidence” supporting the commission’s temporary total disability compensation denial? For the reasons to follow, we find that it is not and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

State ex rel. Johnson v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 339, 340, 533 N.E.2d 720, 721, held that the commission “[i]n determining whether to award permanent total disability, * * * must consider every allowed condition.” (Emphasis added.) That temporary total disability is at issue does not compel a different result.

Dr. Shahabi’s disability conclusions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Vance v. MarikisOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Ganu v. Willow Brook Christian CommunitiesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Kish v. Kroger Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Tradesmen International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State Ex Rel. Crabtree v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, 06ap-458 (6-12-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API