Legal Opinion
Lexecon, Inc. v. Haft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 1996No. Civil Action No. 95-00713Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPORKIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff Lexecon, Inc. (“Lexecon”) and by defendant Sherman, Meehan & Curtin (“SMC”). Defendant SMC hired Lexecon to provide economic consulting services in Herbert Haft’s divorce ease. Lexecon now seeks payment for those services from SMC and Haft. SMC has moved for summary judgment. Lexecon opposes SMC’s motion, and has cross-moved for this Court to enter summary judgment against SMC. At this time, there are no dispositive motions filed by or against defendant Haft.
SMC contends…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Koro Co., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Strzelecki v. Schwarz Paper Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Equitable Life Insurance Co. In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. In Re Adams Properties, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Adams Properties, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Clark v. MadduxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- McNeill v. AppelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.