Legal Opinion
McNeill v. Appel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1964No. 3366PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellee, a handwriting expert, brought .suit against appellant, an attorney, for services performed in a probate proceeding. Appellant filed a third-party complaint .against the administratrix of the estate and -the trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for appellee against appellant and for appellant against the third-party defendant. This appeal followed, appellant’s principal contention being that the ■evidence was insufficient to support a finding against him. No appeal was taken by the third-party defendant.
In Monick v. Melnicoff, D.C.Mun.App., 144…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monick v. MelnicoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Resnick v. Abner B. Cohen Advertising, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Judd & Detweiler, Inc. v. GittingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
- Mayer v. BuchananDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- American Insurance Co. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Myers-Leiber Sign Co. v. WeirichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Lexecon, Inc. v. HaftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Myers-Leiber Sign Co. v. WeirichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966