Legal Opinion
Cicco v. Stockmaster
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 2000No. 1999-0085PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 95.] CICCO ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STOCKMASTER ET AL.; COLONIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cicco v. Stockmaster,
2000-Ohio-434.] Declaratory judgments—Parties—Party challenging constitutionality of a statute must assert the claim in the complaint and must serve the pleading upon the Attorney General in accordance with the methods set forth in Civ.R. 41 in order to vest a trial court with jurisdiction under former R.C. 2721.12. A party who is challenging the constitutionality of a statute…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Winston v. REORGANIZED SCH. DIST. R-2, ETC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Cicco v. StockmasterOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Malloy v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re: Bertram ZweibonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thayer v. W. Carrollton Bd. of Edn., Unpublished Decision (7-23-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Sigler v. State, 08-Ca-79 (4-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009