Polk v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge
Case Summary
Appellant, Thedell A. Polk, appeals the trial court’s decision to revoke his probation for carrying a weapon. Specifically, Polk argues that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop him and thus, the weapon seized from him during the stop was improperly admitted into evidence. We find the police had no reasonable suspicion to stop Polk and despite Polk’s probationary status, reasonable suspicion was required. Therefore, the trial court should have suppressed the weapon seized. As the weapon was the only evidence of Polk violating the conditions of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dulin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kenner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Micheau v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Beer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Pamela J. Hensley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Frye v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.