Legal Opinion
Kenner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1999No. 49A04-9802-CR-89PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal Paul Kenner challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Kenner phrases the issues as follows: (1) is the “plain smell” test valid under Article One, Section Eleven of the Constitution of Indiana, and (2) did the trial court err in finding that under the totality of the circumstances the detention of Kenner for one hour was reasonable. We affirm.
At approximately 7:50 p.m. on September 16, 1996, Officer Paul McDonald of the Indianapolis Police Department stopped a red Ca-maro on Interstate 70 in the city of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Callahan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.