Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 2006No. 82A01-0603-CR-105PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Scott Appellant-defendant ("Seott") appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine as a Class B felony, 1 possession of cocaine as a Class C felony, 2 and carrying a handgun without a license as a Class C felony. 3 We affirm in part and remand in part with instructions. 4
Issues
Scott raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting certain evidence at trial, in violation of the United States Constitution.
In addition, we examine, sua sponte, whether Scott's convictions for possession of cocaine as a Class B…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gregory v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hathaway v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Derek Clanton v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Corwin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.