Legal Opinion
Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 9, 2013No. 2012-1658PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Intellect Wireless, Inc. (Intellect) appeals from the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 7,266,186 ('186 patent) and 7,310,416 ('416 patent) are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. We affirm.
Background
The technology at issue in this case involves wireless transmission of caller identification (ID) information. The asserted patents share the same specification, which discloses providing caller ID information from a message center to a personal communication device, such as a cell phone, via a wireless network. '186 patent, at [57]; id. col. 4.1. 66-col.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Rohm and Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- AstraZeneca UK Ltd. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United Food & Commercial Workers Unions & Emp'rs Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- The Ohio Willow Wood Company v. Alps South, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.