Legal Opinion
American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 26, 2014No. 2013-1061PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge PROST. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
PROST, Chief Judge.
American Calcar Inc. (“Calcar”) appeals from the judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California finding that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,330,497 (“'497 patent”), 6,438,465 (“'465 patent”), and 6,542,795 (“'795 patent”) were unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
This appeal arises from Calcar’s suit against defendant-appellees American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (collectively…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Apotex Inc. v. Ucb, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Merus N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. LaurainCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Evonik Degussa GMBH v. Materia, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.