Legal Opinion

The Ohio Willow Wood Company v. Alps South, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 19, 2016No. 2015-1132, 2015-1133PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This case marks the latest chapter in a long-running dispute between two manufacturers of prosthetic limb accessories. The appellant, The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”), owns a group of patents directed to cushioning devices that fit over the residual stumps of amputated limbs to make the use of prosthetics more comfortable. OWW has asserted its patents against defendant Alps South, LLC (“Alps”) in several actions.

The cushioning devices at issue in this case consist of stretchable pieces of synthetic fabric that are coated with a gel on only the side touching the body.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. NeztsosieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Great Brands v. Kellogg North America CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. U.S. Water Services, Inc. v. Novozymes A/SCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
  4. Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S&N Locating Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Baxter International, Inc. v. CareFusion CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API