Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. CSX Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2003No. 20010411PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 This case addresses two issues of first impression for this court. The first issue is whether federal bankruptcy law should be used to interpret the voidable preference provisions of Utah Code section 81A-27-821 (2001). Appellant, Wilcox, argues that because there is no prior Utah case law addressing section 81A-27-321, 11 U.S.C. § 547(c) (1988), a "comparable" provision of the Federal Bankruptcy code, should guide this court's statutory interpretation. The second issue is whether appellee, CSX Corporation's, actions satisfy either of the affirmative…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. In the Matter of Southmark Corporation, Debtor. Southmark Corporation v. Schulte Roth & ZabelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Gregory LennickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re Energy Cooperative, Inc., Debtor. Energy Cooperative, Inc., Jay A. Steinberg, Trustee v. Socap International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ario v. Ingram Micro, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Burns v. BoydenUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wilcox v. Anchor-Wate Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kelly v. Hard Money Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  5. State v. WatkinsUtah Supreme Court · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API