Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Anchor-Wate Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 2007No. 20050324PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
PARRISH, Justice:
1 Plaintiff Robert Wileox ("Liquidator"), as liquidator for the Utah Insurance Department, brought this action against defendants Anchor Wate Company and its related companies ("Anchor Wate" or the "insured"), alleging that $3.5 million in payments that Anchor Wate had received from Southern American Insurance Company ("SAIC" or the "insurer") constitute voidable preferences under the Utah Insurers Rehabilitation and Liquidation Act (the "Act") 1 Anchor Wate received the payments pursuant to an insurance policy it purchased from SAIC, and various reinsurers…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- In the Matter of Lewis Anson David Edgeworth, M.D., Debtor. Donna Elaine Houston v. Lewis Anson David Edgeworth, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,434 Coral Petroleum, Inc. v. Banque Paribas-LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Floyd v. Dunson (In Re Ramirez Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Yoder v. T.E.L. Leasing, Inc. (In Re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Rawlings v. RawlingsUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- In re C.W. Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.