Walling v. Twyeffort, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly classified the outside tailors as defendant’s employees within the meaning of the Act which contains the following definitions:
“(d) ‘Employer’ includes any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee * * *
“(e) ‘Employee’ includes any individual employed by an employer * * *
“(g) ‘Employ’ includes to suffer or permit to work.”
Homeworkers have been held to be employees within these definitions. Guiseppi v. Walling, 324 U.S. 244, 65 S.Ct. 605, 89 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Michael Keller v. Miri Microsystems LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.