Legal Opinion

Phinney v. Morgan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 28, 1995No. 94-P-514PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action in the Superior Court against their mother for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They alleged that their mother failed to protect them from sexual abuse by their father during their childhood. The defendant moved for summary judgment on the sole ground that their actions were *203barred because they were not brought within three years of their attaining the age of majority. G. L. c. 260, §§ 2A & 7. The judge denied the motion on the ground that the “discovery rule” applied to their claims and, therefore, when their cause of action accrued…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Friedman v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Ng Bros. Construction, Inc. v. CranneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hearndon v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API