Ottenstein v. Britton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
On January 3, 1943, Robert Larmer, a high school boy seventeen years of age, was employed by appellant, District News Company, of the City of Washington. The other appellant, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, was its insurance carrier. Young Larmer on the day above mentioned, and while in the performance of the duties of his employment, sustained an injury resulting in his death. In due time thereafter his mother, Odessa Larmer, appellee, made claim for compensation as a dependent of deceased, under the provisions of the District of Columbia Compensation Act.1 The Commissioner found dependency,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pocahontas Fuel Co. v. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. SheppeardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Michigan Transit Corporation v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1929
- Wende v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Heitmuller v. BerkowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948