Legal Opinion
Steele v. Clinton Electric Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 1, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
In October, 1934, the plaintiff purchased a cottage in Madison, which was suitable for summer use only and which remained unoccupied thereafter until May, 1935. The defendant company has the exclusive privilege of supplying electricity in Madison. The schedule of rates established by the public utilities commission in effect with respect to the territory in which the plaintiff’s cottage is located comprised two plans for residence service, numbered 1 and 2. Plan No. 1 prescribed a straight meter rate of thirteen cents per K. W. H. “Minimum charge $1 per month for each month of the year.” Plan…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- McEntee v. . Kingston Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Wood v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- Sims v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Dodd v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alvin Lucas, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company, a Wisconsin Public Utility CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Cambridge Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Barry v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Trigg v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.