Trautman v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the claimants’ contention, the State demonstrated that its delay in implementing Project Identification Number (hereinafter PIN) 0051.21, instituted by the New York State Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT) in 1968, to correct various deficiencies along an 11.4-mile section of the Grand Central Parkway, inclusive of the Kew Gardens interchange, "stemmed from a legitimate ordering of priorities with other projects based on the availability of funding” (Freidman v State of New York, 67 NY2d 271, 287; see also, Gutelle v City of New York, 55 NY2d 794, 795; Tomassi v Town…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Tomassi v. Town of UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Gutelle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Van De Bogart v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Merino v.New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hough v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Guan v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Harford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.