Legal Opinion

Friedman v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1986PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander, J.

In each of these personal injury actions arising out of "crossover” accidents occurring on highways constructed and maintained by the State of New York in which a vehicle crossed the median dividing opposing lanes of traffic, a common issue is presented: whether the State breached its duty to alleviate a known hazardous highway condition. The alleged negligence in each case was the State’s failure to install median barriers at the accident site. The facts in each case are as follows.

Friedman v State of New York

On March 15, 1978, at about 5:00 p.m., claimant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Matter of NathanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Alexander v. EldredNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Tomassi v. Town of UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Kenavan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Pegasus Aviation I, Inc. v. Varig Logistica S.A.New York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Ernest v. Red Creek Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Turturro ex rel. Turturro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API