State v. Campbell
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.
At trial the State presented evidence that appellant killed Pat Swayngham by dousing him with gasoline and then setting him oh fire. In his jury instructions, the trial judge charged that malice may be implied from the use of a deadly substance or material. Appellant argues this charge was erroneous because there is no precedent for a charge on implied malice from the use of a deadly substance.
The implication of malice may arise from the use of a deadly weapon. State v. Elmore, 279 S. C. 417, 308 S. E. (2d) 781…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- People v. MorganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. MattisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KelseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. IdlebirdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. NavyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.