Legal Opinion
Morrison v. W. R. Reynolds & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
This action is brought to recover $800 claimed to be due on a contract of employment as a bond and stock salesman. The contract, as claimed by the plaintiff, is in the form of a letter reading as follows:
“Detroit, Mich., March 15, 1917. “Mr. Arthur M. Morrison,
Wayne, Michigan!
“Dear Sir: In accordance with our talk in Mr. Reynolds’ office in Jackson, the. other day, I hereby confirm the agreement made with you for your services for the McCuen-Reynolds Company, viz.: that you devote your entire time and work exclusively to selling the bonds and stock of this company on an expense and commission…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Wood v. Standard Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sedorchuk v. WeederMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Horst v. TikkanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. CraigMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969