Legal Opinion

Morrison v. W. R. Reynolds & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This action is brought to recover $800 claimed to be due on a contract of employment as a bond and stock salesman. The contract, as claimed by the plaintiff, is in the form of a letter reading as follows:

“Detroit, Mich., March 15, 1917. “Mr. Arthur M. Morrison,

Wayne, Michigan!

“Dear Sir: In accordance with our talk in Mr. Reynolds’ office in Jackson, the. other day, I hereby confirm the agreement made with you for your services for the McCuen-Reynolds Company, viz.: that you devote your entire time and work exclusively to selling the bonds and stock of this company on an expense and commission…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wood v. Standard Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sedorchuk v. WeederMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Horst v. TikkanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. CraigMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API