Legal Opinion

Horst v. Tikkanen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1963No. Calendar 62, Docket 48,597PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Parties to the Action. Plaintiff-appellant is Mrs. Suoma S. Horst, who was seriously injured in an automobile accident on an ice-slippery road when her car collided with a large dump truck owned and driven by Paul Gelmi, defendant-appellee. At the time, Gelmi was hauling a load of sand to a business establishment of defendants-appellees Raymond Pajula and Taisto Maki. Mildred Tikkanen was operating the station wagon involved in the accident owned jointly with her husband, Emil E. Tikkanen, both defendants-appellees. A jury verdict was rendered in favor of all defendants. From a denial of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schattilly v. YonkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Morrison v. W. R. Reynolds & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. Argo Steel Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Embrey v. WeissmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Agee v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Carey v. TolesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. The GRAY EAGLES, INC. v. LucchesiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API