Legal Opinion
People v. Inge
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 2011PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*676The defendant contends that the hearing court improperly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence because the testimony of the arresting officer at the pretrial suppression hearing was incredible and patently tailored to overcome constitutional objections. However, this contention is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to raise this specific claim before the hearing court (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rivera, 27 AD3d 489, 490 [2006]). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit. “ ‘The credibility determinations of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. VannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. DelgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.