People v. Vann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The specific arguments the defendant makes to support his contention that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of his motion which was to suppress physical evidence are unpreserved for appellate review, as they were not raised before the suppression court (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Inge, 90 AD3d 675 [2011]; People v Thompson, 27 AD3d 495 [2006]). In any event, the contentions are without merit, as the search of his apartment was rationally and reasonably related to the pa*703role officer’s duty to detect and prevent parole violations (see People v Huntley, 43 NY2d 175, 182-183…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. PaulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BorukhovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. FarmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.