Legal Opinion

People v. Moran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*787The County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. “The credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record” (People v Martinez, 58 AD3d 870, 870-871 [2009]; see People v Jackson, 65 AD3d 1164 [2009]).

The record supports the County Court’s determination that the defendant consented to the police entry to his residence (see People v Love, 273 AD2d 842 [2000]). Indeed, the defendant called the police for assistance following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. IngeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API