Legal Opinion

Agilera v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2007No. 49A02-0604-CR-355PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Antonio Agüera (Agüera), appeals his conviction for chüd molesting, a Class C felony, Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Agüera raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:(1) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting statements by chüd victim, K.E.;(2) Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Agüera’s conviction for chüd molesting; and(3) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Agilera’s Motion for Mistrial.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Seven-year-old K.E. lived…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Perez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Barger v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Adams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Ballard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API