Agilera v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Defendant, Antonio Agüera (Agüera), appeals his conviction for chüd molesting, a Class C felony, Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Agüera raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:(1) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting statements by chüd victim, K.E.;(2) Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Agüera’s conviction for chüd molesting; and(3) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Agilera’s Motion for Mistrial.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Seven-year-old K.E. lived…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Perez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Barger v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Adams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ballard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.