Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Wells v. County Commissioners

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 29, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On exceptions. The opinion states the case and material facts. The case of King v. Lewiston, 70 Maine, 406, is the leading authority relating to the powers of the commissioners in laying out highways under the provisions of chapter eighteen.

Read the full summary

On exceptions. The opinion states the case and material facts. The case of King v. Lewiston, 70 Maine, 406, is the leading authority relating to the powers of the commissioners in laying out highways under the provisions of chapter eighteen. It is cited with approval in Acton v.' County Commissioners, 77 Maine, 128. In the case of King v. Lewiston, the commissioners, of Androscoggin Co., laid out a county way entirely within the limits of the city of Lewiston, but leading from one county road to another, and across a third. The court held that the commissioners possessed the authority because…

1Opinion of the CourtVirgin, J.

Sometime prior to 1885, a town road or way was made from the county road, near C. H. Littlefield’s store, to Ogunquit river. The legislature of that year enacted a special act which provided : " A highway may be laid out, constructed and maintained in the manner provided in R. S., c. 18, across the tide waters of Ogunquit river, in the town of Wells ; but not below the southerly line of the road leading from the county *527road, near C. H. Littlefield’s store, to said river.” Spec. L. 1885, c. 497.

After this special act took effect, certain inhabitants of York and of Wells duly petitioned the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Eisen v. Jacquard Fabrics, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1941
  3. Commissioner of Highways v. LudwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API