Chapman v. River
Oregon Supreme Court
From Hood River: Fred W. Wilson, Judge. Department 2. This is a proceeding hy writ of review instituted in the Circnit Court of the State of Oregon in and for Hood River County. Its purpose is to review the action taken hy the common council of the City of Hood River in undertaking to lay out and establish two certain streets within the corporate limits of said city.
Read the full summary
From Hood River: Fred W. Wilson, Judge. Department 2. This is a proceeding hy writ of review instituted in the Circnit Court of the State of Oregon in and for Hood River County. Its purpose is to review the action taken hy the common council of the City of Hood River in undertaking to lay out and establish two certain streets within the corporate limits of said city. The charter of the City of Hood River granted by the legislative assembly of 1901 (see Special Laws, p. 817) contains two chapters relating to streets: Chapter 8, concerning streets, the grade and improvement thereof, and Chapter…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff’s right to review the proceedings of the common council of the City of *49Hood River in attempting to lay ont and open a street through her land is based upon the provision of our Code reading:
“Any party to any process or proceeding before or by any inferior court, officer or tribunal may have the decision or determination thereof reviewed for errors therein, as in this chapter prescribed, and not otherwise. Upon a review, the court may review any intermediate order involving the merits and necessarily affecting the decision or determination sought to be reviewed”: Section 603, Or.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Commonwealth v. CoombsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Kalich v. KnappOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Towns v. Klamath CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Northwestern Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.