Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Highways v. Ludwick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908No. Docket No. 174PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Barry; Smith, J. Proceedings by the commissioner of highways of the township of Hope against Alta L. Ludwick and others to establish a highway. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This case involves the proceedings of the plaintiff highway commissioner in laying out a certain road across the premises of defendants. From his decision an appeal was taken by them to the township board, which affirmed the action of the commissioner and assessed defendant’s damages at $75. Under Act No. 195, Pub. Acts 1905, defendants appealed to the circuit court of Barry county, where the case was tried before the court without a jury, and upon the request of both parties findings of fact and law were made and filed by the court, affirming the action of the township board. Errors are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CoombsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Horn v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. State v. AnthoineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  4. Inhabitants of Wells v. County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  5. Kemp v. StradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Elliott, Et VirSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. Smith v. Meemic InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API