Legal Opinion

Buford v. Dearing

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1973No. 73-143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants, the widow and heirs of Buford Dearing, brought this declaratory judgment action based on their contention that the written provision in a deed created a life estate in Evia Lee Dear-ing with a remainder interest which vested in Buford Dearing at the time the deed was executed. The cause was submitted upon the complaint, the answer, a stipulation of facts, and a deposition together with the briefs of the parties. The chancellor denied appellants’ contention and dismissed the cause for want of equity; Appellants contend bn appeal that it was the intention of B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter Oil Company v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Lawless v. Caddo River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Graves v. BowlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. LipkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. XTO Energy, Inc. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Bradley v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Bennett v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API