Aluminum Co. of America v. Lipke
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.
The issue is whether certain devisees under the will of G. M. Lipke are contingent or vested remaindermen. The controversial clause in the will provides (Par. 3): “I give, bequeath and devise to my beloved wife, Mamie Lipke for and during her natural life, all the real estate which I may own at the time of my death, and at her death the same shall go to my daughters, Marian and Maxine, share and share alike. In the event either of my said daughters dies without children before the death of my wife, all the remainder shall go to the surviving daughter, but in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horsley v. HilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Booe v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Black v. BaileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Harrington v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buford v. DearingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973