Bennett v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
A petition for declaratory judgment was granted by the chancellor. The decree held that the handwritten words on the margins of several deeds were ineffective for the purpose of severing mineral rights from the land. No testimony was taken by the court. On appeal it is argued that the court erred in refusing to take oral testimony and that the handwriting on the deeds constituted reservations of mineral rights. We cannot agree with either argument.
In 1937, W. S. Rogers deeded property to three of his children and the widow of a deceased son. Four separate deeds were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gibson v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Carter Oil Company v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Buford v. DearingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arkansas Presbytery of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church v. Hudson Ex Rel. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Winningham v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- XTO Energy, Inc. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Sides v. BeeneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.