Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pickrell v. Senner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1962No. 7684PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

This matter came to the Supreme Court on a petition filed by the State of Arizona ex rel. Robert W. Pickrell, the Attorney General, for a writ of quo warranto by which the petitioner asked that the office of the respondent, George F. Senner, as Arizona Corporation Commissioner, be declared vacant for violation of A.R.S. § 38-296. This statute reads :

“A. No incumbent of an elective office, whether holding by election or appointment, shall be eligible for nomination or election to any office other than the office so held, nor shall the nomination papers of such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lámar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Whitney v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Buckingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1944
  4. Stockton v. McFarlandArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CraneWyoming Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Conrad Joyner v. Rose Mofford, Secretary of State, State of Arizona Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Adams v. Commission on Appellate Court AppointmentsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Santini v. SwackhamerNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTSArizona Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API