Legal Opinion
British Queen Mining Co. v. Baker Silver Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 16, 1891No. 169PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
139 U.S. 222 (1891)
BRITISH QUEEN MINING COMPANY
v.
BAKER SILVER MINING COMPANY.
No. 169.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 13, 1891.
Decided March 16, 1891.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
Mr. James B. Reilly for plaintiff in error.
Mr. A.H. Wintersteen and Mr. Wayne McVeagh filed a brief for defendant in error. Mr. E.T. Wells, Mr. R.T. McNeal and Mr. John G. Taylor also filed a brief for same.
2Opinion of the Court · FullerChief Justice Fuller
This case was tried by the Circuit Court, without a jury, and under §§ 649 and 700, Rev. Stat., the finding must be "either general or special." It cannot…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Flanders v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by39 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- De La Rama v. De La RamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.