Legal Opinion

Crivaro v. Rader

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1984No. 2-1083A378PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Judge.

Russell Crivaro (Crivaro) defendant-counterclaimant, appeals the trial court's *1185grant of Daniel Rader's (Rader) motion for partial summary judgment limiting Criva-ro's damages on his counterclaim against Rader.

The issue on appeal is whether a defendant-counterclaimant may recover damages in excess of the damages recovered by plaintiff when the statute of limitations for filing an independent action by defendant expires between the time the plaintiff's complaint is filed and the timely filing of the counterclaim.

We affirm.

On February 21, 1981, Rader's semi-tractor trailer…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Eve v. LouisIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Armstrong v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  5. Cherney v. MoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brenda Sue Gittings and Marc Richmond Gittings v. William H. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Murray v. MANSHEIMSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Anderson v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Denna Delacruz and Barry Barger v. Paul WittigIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. James v. Antilles Gas Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API