Legal Opinion

Cherney v. Moody

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1982No. AG-126PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

413 So.2d 866 (1982)

Lee CHERNEY and Tinya G.F. Cherney, Appellants,

v.

C. Gary MOODY, Appellee.

No. AG-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 12, 1982.

Lee Cherney and Tinya G.F. Cherney, pro se, appellants.

Wm. A. Bessent, III, Gainesville, for appellee.

SHAW, Judge.

Appellants seek review of an order which dismissed with prejudice their amended counterclaim. We treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari and accept jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A). We REVERSE AND REMAND.

The facts here are relatively simple. Appellee Moody, an attorney,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Padgett v. First Federal S & L Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Buck v. MouradianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Payne v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Beekner, Et Vir v. L. P. Kaufman, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Metro. Casualty Ins. Co., of New York v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Allie v. IonataSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. ROMAR DEV. v. Gulf View Management Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Yost v. American Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Evans v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Richards Enterprises v. SwoffordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API