Legal Opinion

Nesmith v. Martin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1904No. 4409PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of San Juan County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steele

The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of a certain pipe line, together with the head-gate of said pipe line, on the Animas river, and the right to -use water from the Animas river by and through the said pipe line, and claiming to be in the possession thereof, brought suit in the district court of San Juan county, where the property is situated, to quiet his title thereto, alleging that the defendants claimed some right or title therein. The defendants answered and denied that the plaintiff was the owner of said water right and pipe line, or that he was in the lawful possession thereof, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Randolph v. HelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Enos v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Freeman v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Irvine v. MinshullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  4. Regan v. Customcraft Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Fox v. Denargo Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API