Legal Opinion

Enos v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1907No. 5217; No. 2831 C. APublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the City and County of Denver. Hon. Frank T. Johnson, Judge. Action by Isabel L. E. Anderson and John Pearson Anderson against Charles W. Enos and Sarah E. Enos. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Steele

On May 3, 1893, the plaintiffs (appellees here) executed and delivered to the defendants a warranty deed for the premises known as lots 23 and 24, block 3, Kettle’s Addition to the city of Denver. The consideration named in the deed is twelve thousand dollars. This deed contains a covenant that the property is free and clear of all liens and incumbrances “except a certain deed of trust recorded in book 888, March 7th, 1893, given to secure six thousand dollars at seven and one-half per cent, per annum.” On September 25, 1894, the property was sold under *397the deed of trust for the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Armor v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Nesmith v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Percifield v. RosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Baird v. BairdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Clark v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. City of Westminster v. SKYLINE VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Hafford v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API