Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Minshull

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1915No. 7890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. James H. Teller, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, J.

This action is brought by Thora E. Minshull as plaintiff, against Mary L. Irvine, spoken of as defendant, to recover an undivided one-third interest in the Shell Block in Denver, Colorado. The findings and decree were in favor of plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here on error. It is not difficult to understand the theory and nature of plaintiff’s claim, and the purpose of the action. She alleges that in January, 1908, Joseph E. Hunter, his sister Mary, and his father, jointly purchased the property from the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company of Milwaukee, for $49,000.00, all…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Van Buskirk v. Van BuskirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Keuper v. Unknown Heirs of MetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McClure v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Harris v. McIntyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Castro v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Colorado & Utah Coal Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Ingles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Gayton v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Detra v. BartolettiMontana Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API