Legal Opinion

Tropical Paint & Oil Co v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923No. Docket No. 148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is an action of replevin. An automobile was taken on the writ and delivered to plaintiif. The defendant prevailed, waived return of the car, and had judgment for $1,800. Plaintiff brings error.

Plaintiff is an Ohio corporation, engaged in the manufacture and sale of paint. Defendant was a salesman in its employ for several years. Plaintiff loaned or advanced to defendant $800, which sum was charged against him on its books. To secure the amount advanced, defendant made' and delivered a property note, so-called, for the amount, covering his said car, giving plaintiff the right to take…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadwell v. PrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. People ex rel. Cummer v. Judge of the Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Campbell v. QuackenbushMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zoski v. GainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gemsa v. DornerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dart National Bank v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API